A shallow look at topics of slight interest
Why not both? ... Would be toasty.
Ken,You're kidding, of course. I would prefer to live in a house where the heating didn't require a constant flow of money and resources. It sounds like a dream to me. Impossible! But there it is in a newspaper article. Stack that up against coal heating? Nothing beats coal. That is, I mean to say, "Nothing" beats "Coal."--David
We could burn newspapers in special "old-media furnaces" or we could huddle around virtual bonfires on our computers.
Look at the windows for the clue.Crank out windows: DeutchlandSliding door: USA number one.
Post a Comment
4 comments:
Why not both? ... Would be toasty.
Ken,
You're kidding, of course. I would prefer to live in a house where the heating didn't require a constant flow of money and resources.
It sounds like a dream to me. Impossible! But there it is in a newspaper article. Stack that up against coal heating?
Nothing beats coal. That is, I mean to say, "Nothing" beats "Coal."
--David
We could burn newspapers in special "old-media furnaces" or we could huddle around virtual bonfires on our computers.
Look at the windows for the clue.
Crank out windows: Deutchland
Sliding door: USA number one.
Post a Comment